A clause-by-clause review against the CEO's source drafts found a few
places where the rendered copy had strayed from the originals beyond the
intended cleaning (token fills + stripping internal [COUNSEL]/[MATT]/
[Connor:] markers). Restoring exact wording:
- DPA C5: keep as operative prose (not the source's editorial "publish a
page" bracket) but match the original phrasing exactly — "as
independent controller", "Claude/embedding models — receives ...",
comma-separated list — and re-add the dropped "(verified against the
signed provider agreements, Jul 10, 2026)".
- EULA intro: re-add the dropped substantive text, including "For
customers under a signed Stirling Enterprise Agreement, that agreement
controls."
- MSA intro: revert to the source's "incorporated by reference" (drop the
added "to the extent stated in Section 9.1" qualifier).
- Restore bold emphasis on MSA 1.3 and DPA C1/C5/C6 sentences.
- SLA: "MSA Section 5.2" -> "MSA §5.2"; Order Form menu: "included as
elected" -> "include as elected".
No clause, number, price, or obligation changed — this only realigns
prose the review flagged as non-verbatim. Still DRAFT, attorney review
required before execution.
Connor Yoh
c99c7d9fc7