The previous implementations resulted in an overload being hidden by one
without a default parameter, making it unclear which method was being
called. For example, consider the following signatures:
public MultipartItem(string content, string contenttype = null, string name = null, string filename = null)
public MultipartItem(string contenttype, string name = null, string filename = null)
From https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/programming-guide/classes-and-structs/named-and-optional-arguments,
> If two candidates are judged to be equally good, preference goes to a
> candidate that does not have optional parameters for which arguments
> were omitted in the call. This is a consequence of a general preference
> in overload resolution for candidates that have fewer parameters.
When the code following the await can be executed on any thread, it's
recommended to use ConfigureAwait(false) to avoid unnecessary context
switching and potential deadlocks.
This class extends HttpClient and uses an OAuthHttpMessageHandler under the covers to automatically authenticate requests.
Additionally, it automatically respects the global HttpContextSettings for overall timeout, read/write timeout, and SSL certificate validation.
(BufferRequests isn't currently handled, as HttpClient doesn't seem to easily expose that flag, and as of .NET 4.5, seems to not buffer by default.)
This class implements the abstract HttpMessageHandler class (mostly via the default HttpClientHandler implementation).
This abstract class is used by System.Net.Http.HttpClient as the underlying HTTP mechanism, and in this particular case is used to automatically add an authorization header to each request.
It also provides a method for marking a request as one that should not be authenticated.
These parameters weren't being used in the method body, or being passed in by any callers (it looks like a copy / paste error when a previous method was converted into this one)
These are replaced with a new optional parameter (method) which allows the caller to request a custom HTTP method to be used.
Using strong-named assemblies can cause difficulties with the GNU LGPL
license, which allows for one to recombine or relink their application
with modified versions of the code. While one solution is to share the
private key so that people can sign the assemblies themselves, this
would break the trust that is expected from signed assemblies. For now,
the easiest fix is to simply not sign the assemblies. Note that by
doing so, we prevent the code from being referenced from other signed
assemblies.
This also fixes an issue introduced in revision ba94d36a80 ("Added
auto-update for WindowsService and Service."), where the WindowsService
project (signed) referenced the AutoUpdater project (not signed).
We also removed instances of <SignAssembly>false</SignAssembly> to be
consistent with newly created .csproj files that do not contain the
SignAssembly element.
This was motivated by the discussion in issue #2814.
Sean Templeton