Files
XC_VM/docs/agents/domain.md
T
Divarion_D a0ed41df16 docs(agents): add issue-tracker + domain consumer docs
Per-repo config the engineering skills read: docs/agents/issue-tracker.md
(GitHub Issues via gh for Vateron-Media/XC_VM) and docs/agents/domain.md
(single-context CONTEXT.md + docs/adr/ consumer rules).
2026-08-07 20:27:42 +03:00

36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

# Domain Docs
How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
This is a **single-context** repo: one `CONTEXT.md` and one `docs/adr/` at the repo root.
## Before exploring, read these
- **`CONTEXT.md`** at the repo root (if it exists).
- **`docs/adr/`** — read ADRs that touch the area you're about to work in.
If any of these files don't exist, **proceed silently**. Don't flag their absence; don't suggest creating them upfront. The `/domain-modeling` skill (reached via `/grill-with-docs` and `/improve-codebase-architecture`) creates them lazily when terms or decisions actually get resolved.
## File structure
```
/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/adr/
│ ├── 0001-....md
│ └── 0002-....md
└── src/
```
## Use the glossary's vocabulary
When your output names a domain concept (in an issue title, a refactor proposal, a hypothesis, a test name), use the term as defined in `CONTEXT.md`. Don't drift to synonyms the glossary explicitly avoids.
If the concept you need isn't in the glossary yet, that's a signal — either you're inventing language the project doesn't use (reconsider) or there's a real gap (note it for `/domain-modeling`).
## Flag ADR conflicts
If your output contradicts an existing ADR, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding:
> _Contradicts ADR-0007 (...) — but worth reopening because…_